tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6416385526593383847.post8429128390538921582..comments2024-03-13T00:53:59.549-04:00Comments on Raastech Blog: Bug in the SOA Suite 10g 10.1.3.5 patchset for Windows affects BPEL redeploymentsAhmed Aboulnagahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17300393989634195878noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6416385526593383847.post-11124711788839202016-12-19T09:14:56.258-05:002016-12-19T09:14:56.258-05:00Hm, very interesting and unusual decision I can sa...Hm, very interesting and unusual decision I can say. Thank you so much! Recently I found out about one file <a href="http://fix4dll.com/msvcr80_dll" rel="nofollow">http://fix4dll.com/msvcr80_dll</a> which is necessary for Windows. Without it some of your applications can work wrong. So, I advise you to download it.Robert Harthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10729676003109996689noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6416385526593383847.post-76979059800745854492012-03-06T08:56:26.825-05:002012-03-06T08:56:26.825-05:00Have you checked this out?http://blog.ipnweb.com/2...Have you checked this out?<br><br>http://blog.ipnweb.com/2010/10/error-load-of-wsdl-x-with-message-part.htmlAhmed Aboulnagahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02439082325124211869noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6416385526593383847.post-69504345582098909222012-03-06T06:36:37.085-05:002012-03-06T06:36:37.085-05:00hi Ahmed ,nice blog..but i have a question in my c...hi Ahmed ,nice blog..<br>but i have a question in my case when i migrated the code it got successfully migrated but when making it it says <br><br>error(4,211);Load of wsdl "myproject.wsdl" with message part element undefined in wsdl{partname=payloadType="namespace"}CollectionOfSystems Failed... but according to your answer i dont find any target namespaces in my types tagSOA Technology for beginners and learnershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09467951255433102508noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6416385526593383847.post-41781386835838820612010-07-30T04:58:32.023-04:002010-07-30T04:58:32.023-04:00As Anirban said, change the version number in buil...As Anirban said, change the version number in build.properties and compile and deploy using ant tasks.Nagarajhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09803117737663172769noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6416385526593383847.post-4375877361724482602010-06-21T04:31:34.685-04:002010-06-21T04:31:34.685-04:00another workaround could be deploying it with a di...another workaround could be deploying it with a different versionAnirbannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6416385526593383847.post-43604391116407971222010-01-08T11:24:28.371-05:002010-01-08T11:24:28.371-05:00You have two options at this point; option 2 being...You have two options at this point; option 2 being the better one.<br><br>(1) Download "Process Explorer" from http://download.sysinternals.com/Files/ProcessExplorer.zip<br><br>In it, click on "Find --> Find Handle or DLL", type the file that is locked, find the process that is locking it, and try to kill that process. I am not sure of the behavior here. You may not be able to kill the process; or it may crash or cause instability in your container.<br><br>(2) Download "Unlocker" from http://www.filecrop.com/9310040/index.html (the actual "unlocker1.8.5.exe" has since been removed from the author's original site).<br><br>Install "Unlocker" and make sure to select 'SentTo shortcut' during the installation. Then right-click on the locked file and select 'Unlock All'.<br><br><br>If you cannot find it or have difficulty downloading "Unlocker", then contact me via the contact form on http://thisisahmed.com.Ahmedhttp://thisisahmed.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6416385526593383847.post-27999341530868075672010-01-08T10:34:00.787-05:002010-01-08T10:34:00.787-05:00Where can I get the process unlocker utility ?Where can I get the process unlocker utility ?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6416385526593383847.post-29138372311881681742009-11-26T00:08:06.655-05:002009-11-26T00:08:06.655-05:00The server is 10.1.3.4 (OC4J, ESB and BPEL) and Jd...The server is 10.1.3.4 (OC4J, ESB and BPEL) and Jdeveloper was also 10.1.3.4 - it could not handled nested XML of ESB. Agreed!!!<br><br>But, when we changed the JDeveloper to 10.1.3.5 - the EBOs got complied and we were able to deploy to the ESB (v.10.1.3.4)<br><br>However, JDeveloper(10.1.3.5) is not able to deploy the BPEL processes to the BPEL Server.<br><br>Is it due to the version mismatch? (JDev being 10.1.3.5 and BPEL Engine being 10.1.3.4)?<br><br>We tried to deploy the BPEL process using JDev 10.1.3.4 - but build failed as there is not nested XML capability.<br><br>Kindly suggest a way out of this catch-22 situation.<br><br><a href="http://www.r4-ds-kort.dk" rel="nofollow">nintendo dsi r4</a>sandrahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01232397653883363100noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6416385526593383847.post-64279060569776764232009-10-24T04:02:55.716-04:002009-10-24T04:02:55.716-04:00The work around is Undeploy the process.Shut down ...The work around is Undeploy the process.Shut down SOA suite and then delete the folder in question<br>and then restart the soa suit and then deploy it .Note that the versioning does not happen properly in this versionsaci_cv at yahoo.co.uknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6416385526593383847.post-1085362955119035702009-10-21T02:37:03.122-04:002009-10-21T02:37:03.122-04:00Anonymous, i've tried to follow your advice, b...Anonymous, i've tried to follow your advice, but failed.<br> A new TMP value hasn't given any advance.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6416385526593383847.post-66163406216338292952009-10-14T04:44:57.782-04:002009-10-14T04:44:57.782-04:00Hi,this might be related to incorrect values for t...Hi,<br>this might be related to incorrect values for the TMP variable set in opmn.xml.<br>If this is set to something like this:<br>variable id="TMP" value="C:\DOCUME~1\ADMIN~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\1"/ try to change it to a directory owned by the local Administrator of the server.<br><br>A value like the one above indicates that a Remote Desktop session (console id 1) was used to install/upgrade (Temp\1)...<br><br>I recommend using mstsc /console or if that doesn't give you access to console 0, try using mstsc /admin.<br><br>Regards,<br>Jøran LagerAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com